Blog Post #16 - Coriolanus Act 1

What is Shakespeare’s larger purpose in his characterization of Coriolanus in Act 1?

One of the plays written in the final years of Shakespeare’s life, Coriolanus, was a political play. All though this play was considered his worst, Shakespeare still made the character of Coriolanus demonstrate the greater significance of a classical hero's role in society. The focal purpose of Shakespeare characterizing Coriolanus in Act 1 is to elaborate on the idea of a demigod-like character that ends with his warriors triumphant. Shakespeare creates a theme of downfall throughout the play by imitating forces of conflict in the play while still reminding the audience of the importance of the setting and genre.
Within Act 1, Shakespeare deliberately introduces Coriolanus also known as Caius Martius to be a brave, worthy and frightening warrior in battle by giving calling him a demigod. Shakespeare regularly reminds the audience of the genre the play complies to; an unconventional political tragedy which happens when Coriolanus runs for consul. Coriolanus' ability on the battlefield seem to make him an ideal hero for most of the people; however, he lacked the ability to be a suitable leader to fulfil the needs of the plebeians. The only way to win consul, Caius must first win the vote of the plebeians. The imagery Shakespeare used to create a demigod-like status for Coriolanus, made the plebeians feel obligated to praise and thank Coriolanus seen as "he has done nobly ... and therefore let Coriolanus be consul".
Shakespeare develops the theme ‘downfall’ using severe destruction throughout the play. Set in the aftermath of the transition from monarchy to republic in Rome, the play portrays Coriolanus as if he were trapped among two distinct worlds. One, a world of violence, action and warriors which represents the battlefield and the other world is political representing the capitol. In Act 1 it was evident that Coriolanus was seen to be a kingly figure, born to command soldiers for war, kill without remorse and follow no man's tactics, adding to the image of a demigod-like individual. Shakespeare vividly portrayed Coriolanus as a character on the battlefield to show the vast contrast in personality in which was needed to be in politics. This just reiterates that Coriolanus may have been a skilful and brave demigod on the battlefield but his natural savage approach won't work to win the citizens.
To complete, the larger purpose behind Shakespeare's characterisation of Coriolanus is to develop Coriolanus' warrior traits, allowing him to highlight and contrast between his ability as a warrior on the battlefield and as a politician in the capitol, accentuating the theme of his demigod-like downfall at the end of the play.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog Post #1 - About Me

Image
I have many interests such as golf, Jiu-jitsu, and swimming but in the UAE I only follow my golf as I have not found a swimming club that I like and the Katana Jiu-jitsu I studied is not practiced in the UAE.  The most important things that I care about in my life are: my golf, my school results, my family and most of all my friends, but this  year my dream is to be able to successfully reduce my score in golf from an average of 82 to 79 as this will make it that I am playing the course to my handicap, therefore making very happy with my position within Troon. I would like this, as I am looking at getting an internship with Troon when I graduate from the Diploma Programme to get some work experience while I take a gap year between finishing the Diploma Programme and starting University. I have found that learning different languages has opened up many doors for me in life I am not being limited to where I can work in future years. Having learnt 3 languages in my life to the point wh
Read more

Blog Post #13 - Speaking in Tongues Blog Post

What did medieval linguist Antonio de Nebrija mean when he told Queen Isabella that: “language is the perfect instrument of empire?” How has language contributed to colonial power? Focus on a specific example. Language is a are dominant for any person to communicating with others in our day-to-day life’s. A s generations are added to families, that family’s native language will eventually be lost as it is not understand therefore making it hard to communicate which is the whole purpose of any language. Not only is the language being lost, but so is a culture. Language is important within a culture as language and culture are strongly linked together. By eradicating other languages and forcing another language upon a country you are essentially mentally taking over an entire nation. Behind each language you can find a country/nation’s history. By eliminating an entire nation’s language, you are destroying that countries/nation’s history wiping out the nation an
Read more

Blog Post #31 - TATD - Said Passage Analysis

Quote: "That was how your own parents were buried: your father, Amm Mahran, the kindly concierge of the student’s hostel, who died middle-aged after a hard but honest and satisfying life. You helped him in his work from your childhood on. For all the extreme simplicity, even poverty of their lives, the family enjoyed sitting together when the day’s work was done, in their ground-floor room at the entrance to the building, where Amm Mahran and his wife would chat together while their child played. His piety made him happy, and the students respected him. The only entertainment he knew was making pilgrimage to the home of Sheikh Ali al-Junaydi, and it was through your father that you came to know the house. “Come along,” he’d say, “and I’ll show you how to have more fun than playing in the fields. You’ll see how sweet life can be, what it’s like in an atmosphere of godliness." Passage Analysis - Page 101: In chapter eleven, the reader begins to see a lot of chara
Read more